← All demos

BANKING OPS / INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENT

Alderwick Services

Trace the ownership chain before completing the exercise onboarding review.

Interactive demo

WHAT YOU’RE LOOKING AT

One environment. Your answer.

A fictional account applicant names a corporate shareholder as its ultimate owner. Two holding-company records reveal the natural persons behind the chain.

Read the evidence and make your choices. The grader checks your numbers, the trap, and your decision. Edit and grade again.

The data room4 documents · Read the excerpts before you decide
Account applicationApplication ownership field

Alderwick Services declares Pinebridge Holdings as its 100% shareholder and labels it the ultimate owner.

Back to correction ↓
Pinebridge ownership registerPinebridge register §1

Pinebridge Holdings is owned 100% by Stonehaven Holdings. No natural person appears on this intermediate record.

Back to correction ↓
Stonehaven ownership registerStonehaven register §2

Stonehaven Holdings is owned 80% by fictional Maya Linwood and 20% by fictional Noel Hartwell.

Back to correction ↓
Fictional onboarding policyExercise onboarding policy §4

Trace every corporate layer to natural persons. For this exercise, obtain identity verification for any natural person with at least 25% indirect ownership before clearance. Ownership discovery alone is not identity verification.

Back to correction ↓
Available tools in the scripted example4 tools
  • read_applicationInspect the applicant’s declared owners.
  • lookup_entityRead a supplied fictional ownership register.
  • trace_ownershipMultiply ownership percentages through the chain.
  • submit_onboarding_reviewDocument ultimate owners and missing verification.

Try the task.

The interactive task is loading. You can also follow the scripted example below.

THE SCRIPTED EXAMPLE

Follow the same task, step by step.

See a plausible mistake, the correction, and the reasoning behind each check.

AGENT ATTEMPT

Follow the attempt.

Scripted calls. Highlighted: the missed trap.

  1. read_application

    Declared ultimate owner: Pinebridge Holdings, 100%.

    Tool arguments
    {"applicant":"Alderwick Services"}
  2. submit_onboarding_reviewMissed trap

    Review stops at the first corporate shareholder.

    Tool arguments
    {"cleared":true,"ultimate_owner":"Pinebridge Holdings"}
Submitted answer

Clear onboarding. Pinebridge Holdings owns 100%, so the ultimate owner is fully identified.

Senior correction

SENIOR CORRECTION

What changes, and why.

Authored illustration; no actual expert review.

AGENT OUTPUT

Clear onboarding. Pinebridge Holdings owns 100%, so the ultimate owner is fully identified.

CORRECTED OUTPUT

Trace Pinebridge → Stonehaven → natural persons. Maya’s indirect ownership is 100% × 100% × 80% = 80%; Noel’s is 20%. Hold clearance pending Maya’s identity verification under the exercise policy.

The correction

A company name closes neither the ownership chain nor identity verification. The authored rule requires looking through both holding companies.

Exact evidence

Compare grading

GRADING

Same checks. Better answer.

The same exercise grader scores the starting answer and reference correction below. Try your own answer to compare.

Exercise grades for the scripted starting answer and reference correction
What is checkedAgent attemptAfter correction
01

Numbers right?

0 / 2 checks pass

Maya's indirect ownership is 100% × 100% × 80% = 80%.

2 / 2 checks pass

Maya's indirect ownership is 100% × 100% × 80% = 80%.

02

Traps caught?

0 / 2 checks pass

Look through Pinebridge and Stonehaven to both natural persons.

2 / 2 checks pass

Look through Pinebridge and Stonehaven to both natural persons.

03

Sound decision?

0 / 1 checks pass

Hold clearance pending Maya's identity verification; discovering ownership is not verification.

1 / 1 checks pass

Hold clearance pending Maya's identity verification; discovering ownership is not verification.

Fictional, authored environment. Your submission is scored by a deterministic exercise grader; the walkthrough shows a scripted example.

Similar agent failures?

Discuss a workflow without source records or confidential information.

For Finance Agent Companies